Volume 12, Issue 5 e726
Update

Rethinking the role of law in adapting to climate change

Jan McDonald

Corresponding Author

Jan McDonald

Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia

Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Correspondence

Jan McDonald, Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tas 7002, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Phillipa C. McCormack

Phillipa C. McCormack

Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Australia

Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2021
Citations: 4

Edited by: Lisa Dilling, Domain Editor and Mike Hulme, Editor-in-Chief

This article is an update of: The role of law in adapting to climate change

Abstract

The article evaluates the role of law in adaptation over the past decade. We track the emergence of international adaptation law within the climate and non-climate regime, alongside increasingly dire extreme events and strident scientific consensus. Examining the growth in national and subnational laws for adaptation, we reflect on the role of framework legislation and legal mechanisms used in sectoral laws. Based on progress over the past decade, we outline how the role of law can be enhanced and accelerated in the decade ahead. We identify important trends in adaptation law and consider the potential for these innovations to drive future adaptation: the sheer growth in priority and volume of laws directed towards adaptation; the intersection of adaptation with other policy domains, especially disaster risk reduction; the need for improved architecture for funding adaptation; and the important role of strategic litigation. Largely absent from the past decade of adaptation law reform is evaluation of effectiveness, or examples of systemic reform that addresses underlying causes of vulnerability. With slow progress in implementing transformational adaptation law reform, we identify five design principles for adaptation laws. The design of laws must (1) be responsive to change; (2) address equity dimensions of climate change; (3) implement innovative solutions; (4) maximize co-benefits; and (5) establish processes for managing trade-offs.

This article is categorized under:

  • Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation

Graphical Abstract

Legal design principles for climate adaptation law. The design of laws for adaptations must (1) be responsive to change; (2) address equity dimensions of climate change; (3) implement innovative solutions; (4) maximize co-benefits; and (5) establish processes for managing trade-offs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study